Loading The Prop Examiner research
Independent · source-linked · no paid rankings
Prop firm reviews, without the sales pitch.
Compare the rules that actually decide a challenge: drawdown, targets, payouts, consistency and cost. Every material claim is labelled, dated and linked to evidence.
Affiliate disclosure: we may earn from some clearly labelled links. Editorial ratings are not for sale. Challenges are simulated products and payouts are never guaranteed. How we stay independent.
- active firms
- 19
- plans compared
- 103
- editorial ratings
- 19
- paid rankings
- 0
Choose your route
Start with the decision in front of you.
You do not need to read the whole market. Pick the question, then follow the evidence.
Flagship comparison
Compare plans rule by rule
Filter 103 plans, pin up to five, highlight verified standout values and open the source behind any figure.
DossiersResearch one firmRead the verdict, rules, prices, payouts, risks and every cited source.ShortlistsFind the best fitStart with your market, trading style, payout preference or rule tolerance.Pre-buyCheck before payingWork through the exact terms that most often change the real cost of a challenge.
Flagship tool / normalised evidence
Compare every plan, rule by rule.
103 account plans from 19 firms — filter by any rule, payout, or price, then pin the finalists into one normalised table.
Filter by
- Profit split
- Drawdown type
- Payout speed
- Account size
- Platform
- Automation
- Min trading days
- Entry price
Side-by-side preview3 of 103
| Dimension | FundingPips1-step | The5ers2-step | E8 Markets1-step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit split | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Profit target | 10% | 10% | 6% |
| Max daily loss | 3% | 5% | 3% |
| Entry price | $322 | $19 | $48 |
Static preview — the live tool pins up to 5 plans, highlights standout values, and links every figure to its source.
Editorial score, not sponsorship
Top-rated firm dossiers
Ranked only by our published score. Open a dossier to see the evidence and trade-offs behind it.
- #01FTMOEstablished two-step model with a documented scaling plan.Snapshot90% split · from $1554.4/5
- #02UpcomersHigh advertised split, fast-payout positioning, broad product line.Snapshot99% split · from $394.4/5
- #03TopstepEstablished futures evaluation via the Trading Combine, 90% split.Snapshot100% split · from $494.3/5
- #04The5ersEstablished forex/CFD firm with a profit split that scales toward 100%.Snapshot100% split · from $154.2/5
- #05FundingPipsTiered split up to 100% with a weekly “Tuesday Pay Day” cadence.Snapshot100% split · from $2244.1/5
Trader research, answered
Go straight to the rules people are checking.
These are the firm and automation topics already beginning to surface in search.
Futures evaluationTopstep rules, pricing and activation feesA source-linked guide to the Trading Combine, funded rules, consistency and payout conditions.Forex & CFDMaven Trading review and payout evidencePlans, drawdown rules, profit split, pricing and the claims to verify before checkout.AutomationProp firms that allow EAs, bots and algo tradingCompare automation, copy-trading, HFT and platform policies across the tracked firms.
From the research desk
Latest rule explainers
· Account types
Swing accounts at prop firms: what you gain and what you give up
Some firms sell a 'swing' version of their account so you can hold trades over the weekend once funded. Here's what that label actually changes, and what it costs you in leverage, lot size and payout options.
Read analysis
· Pricing
Prop firm break-even math: how much profit it takes to cover your challenge fee
A challenge fee is only the start of the cost. Here is a simple way to work out how much funded profit you need before a prop account has paid for itself — and the rules that move that number.
Read analysis
· Account size
Maximum allocation limits: how much funded capital one prop trader can hold
Buying a second or third challenge doesn't always mean more capital. Most firms cap the total simulated balance, or the number of accounts, one trader can hold. Here is how those limits work and what to check.
Read analysis
How the desk works
Evidence before verdict.
Separate the claim
Advertised maximums never masquerade as ordinary outcomes.
Read the binding rule
Drawdown, consistency and payout eligibility come before headline splits.
Link the evidence
Every material figure carries a source and a date, with uncertainty shown.
Content last reviewed: .
Clearly separated advertising
This is a labelled paid placement. It cannot change a rating, verdict or ranking.
Ready to narrow the field?